Diabetes treatment Januvia and Janumet ( sitagliptin / metformin ) could be linked to occurrences of acute pancreatitis, According to the FDA.
This is the same problem that sunk sales of Amylin Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s Byetta.
88 cases of acute pancreatitis were reported to the fda in Januvia patients between 10/06 and 02/09.
The agency is working with Merck to include new warning information on the drug’s label.
“It is recommended that health care professionals monitor patients carefully for the development of pancreatitis after initiation or dose increases,” the agency said, in a statement.
Patients who take these drugs are advised by the FDA to discuss this news with thier doctor and advice that healthcare professionals monitor patients carefully for the development of pancreatitis after initiation or dose increases of sitagliptin or sitagliptin/metformin.
Still, the agency said it is unknown whether these patients are at an increased risk for developing pancreatitis and the medication should be used with caution and with appropriate monitoring in patients with a history of the condition.
“Because acute pancreatitis is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, and early recognition is important in reducing adverse health outcomes, FDA is recommending revisions to the prescribing information to alert health care professionals to this potentially serious adverse drug event,” the agency said.
What is sitagliptin?
Sitagliptin is an oral diabetes medicine that helps control blood sugar levels. It works by regulating the levels of insulin your body produces after eating.
Sitagliptin is for people with type 2 diabetes (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes. Sitagliptin is sometimes used in combination with other diabetes medications, but is not for treating type 1 diabetes.
If you or someone you care about has taken a medication and suffered adverse side effects, we urge you to contact our law offices today. You may have actually injected or ingested a defective drug; if so, you could be entitled to monetary compensation for any pain and suffering that resulted from your experiences with the product.
Law firms recently have started taking inquires from people who may have a potential yasmin lawsuit due to injury from side effects.
The FDA issued a letter to Bayer AG and strongly suggested that they talk about the numerous side effects. The FDA felt that the ads were misleading These claims are misleading because they suggest that Yasmin’s “different kind of hormone” offers unique “chemistry” benefits and that this difference contributes to the high rate of drug efficacy.
Yasmin is a type of birth control pill marketed and manufactured by the German company Bayer Schering Pharma AG Yasmin first entered the American market in 2001 and has generated close to 500 million in sales to date.Yasmin is an oral contraceptive and is a synthetic spironolactone analogue known in the medical world as drospirenone.
Drospirenone binds to the progesterone receptor, the resulting complex becomes activated and binds to specific sites on DNA. This leads to an increased difficulty of sperm entry into the uterus and implantation.
When the Yasmin TV advertising started the FDA took issue with the television commercials which featured women discussing the benefits of the product. The ads had a music score and dialog between the actors.
While there has been no official Yasmin recall, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has warned Bayer AG that the advertising campaign for Yasmin and Yaz were misleading, namely that the ads suggested a broad useage of the medication, minimized potentially serious side effects, and overstated the efficacy of the pill.
Twice have letters been sent to Bayer AG, and once has Bayer AG been ordered to correct its ads, costing the company a total of $20 million. Bayer AG is also under obligation to submit future ad campaigns to the FDA for approval before it launches them in the U.S.
Federal drug regulators warned consumers to stop using Zicam, a popular homeopathic cold remedy, because it could damage or destroy their sense of smell.
The action is an early indication that the Obama administration is likely to take far more aggressive enforcement actions againstdrug companies than the Bush administration did.
The Food and Drug Administration received 130 reports from consumers and doctors of people losing their sense of smell after using one of the Zicam nasal products, which include Zicam Cold Remedy and Zicam Cold Remedy Swabs. The reports date to 1999, when Matrixx Initiatives of Scottsdale, Ariz., first introduced the products.
In 2006, Matrixx paid $12 million to settle 340 lawsuits from Zicam users who claimed that the product destroyed their sense of smell, a condition known as anosmia. Hundreds more such suits have since been filed.
Although the F.D.A. took no action during the Bush administration, Dr. Margaret A. Hamburg, who was named the agency commissioner by President Obama, said the incidence of anosmia associated with Zicam “strikes us as a fairly large problem.”
The agency issued its consumer alert even though Matrixx refused to recall its products, a highly unusual event. In a news release, Matrixx said it had suspended shipments of Zicam and would reimburse customers who wanted a refund.
“Matrixx Initiatives stands behind the science of its products and its belief that there is no causal link between its intranasal gel products and anosmia,” the release said. “For this reason, Matrixx Initiatives believes that the F.D.A. action is unwarranted and will seek a meeting with the F.D.A. to review the company’s product safety data.”
Matrixx had $101 million in sales last year, of which $40 million came from Zicam products. Because Matrixx has called Zicam a homeopathic product, the company was not required to seek agency approval before selling it.
The F.D.A. does not have the power to order product recalls but must rely on manufacturers to do so voluntarily. Bills now moving through Congress would give the agency that power. Bush administration appointees said the F.D.A. did not need mandatory recall authority because companies always withdrew unsafe products when asked.
But the government sometimes negotiated for days or weeks before companies agreed to recalls, leading many more consumers to be put at risk. And the Zicam case demonstrates that aggressive enforcement action can lead to disagreements.
An F.D.A. warning letter sent to Matrixx on Tuesday states that Zicam Cold Remedy intranasal products “may pose a serious risk to consumers who use them” and are “misbranded.” Such language would normally describe a recall alert. The products have no proven benefits.
Matrixx has received more than 800 reports of Zicam users losing their sense of smell but did not provide those reports to the F.D.A., said Deborah M. Autor, director of compliance in the agency’s drug center. The law requires producers of approved drugs to forward to the F.D.A. all reports of product-related injuries, but Ms. Autor declined to say whether this reporting requirement applied to Matrixx.
“This disabling loss of one of the five senses may be long lasting or even permanent in some people,” Ms. Autor said. “People without the sense of smell may not be able to detect dangers such as gas leaks or smoke. They could lose much of the pleasure of eating, adversely impacting the quality of life.”
Dr. Charles E. Lee, a compliance officer in the agency’s drug center, said zinc could be toxic to nerve receptors in the nose. In the 1930s, intranasal zinc was tested as a polio preventative, and some patients suffered anosmia, Dr. Lee said.
Recalled lot number: 112680A, expiration date July 31, 2010
Product Name: Propafenone HCL tablets
Shipped: Between October 15, 2008 and November 26, 2008.
The lot is being recalled because some tablets may contain slightly higher levels of the active ingredient than specified. The recalled tablets were manufactured by Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Because it has a narrow therapeutic index, some patients who are particularly sensitive to small variations in dose may experience potentially , including arrhythmias (irregular heartbeat) or low blood pressure.
Propafenone is a drug product used to treat cardiac arrhythmias (irregular heartbeats). It has a narrow therapeutic index, so some patients who are particularly sensitive to small variations in dose may experience potentially serious side effects, including arrhythmias (irregular heartbeat) or low blood pressure. Consequently, as a precautionary measure, Watson is recalling this one lot to the consumer level to minimize any potential risk to patients.
Anyone who has 225 mg Propafenone HCL tablets should check the bottle for the lot number and expiration date to see if they have tablets being recalled. Anyone with 225 mg Propafenone HCL tablets being recalled should call (888) 352-9616, Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. EDT, for instructions on how to return affected product.
Patients using 225 mg Propafenone HCL tablets who have medical questions should contact their health-care provider.
Any adverse reactions experienced with the use of this product, and/or quality problems should also be reported to the FDA’s MedWatch Program by phone at 1-800-FDA-1088, by Fax at 1-800-FDA-0178, by mail at MedWatch, FDA, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852-9787, or on the MedWatch Web site at www.fda.gov/medwatch
Chronic use of metoclopramide has been linked to tardive dyskinesia, which may include involuntary and repetitive movements of the body, even after the drugs are no longer taken. These symptoms are rarely reversible and there is no known treatment.
Metoclopramide is available in a variety of formulations including tablets, syrups and injections. Names of metoclopramide-containing products include Reglan Tablets, Reglan Oral Disintegrating Tablets, Metoclopramide Oral Solution, and Reglan Injection.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today issued a public health advisory concerning three confirmed, and one possible report of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare brain infection, in patients using the psoriasis drug Raptiva (efalizumab). Three of those patients have died.
All four patients were treated with the drug for more than three years. None of the patients were receiving other treatments that suppress the immune system.
The FDA is reviewing this latest information. The agency will take appropriate steps to:
ensure that the risks of Raptiva do not outweigh its benefits;
that patients prescribed Raptiva are clearly informed of the signs and symptoms of PML; and
that health care professionals carefully monitor patients for the possible development of PML.
The FDA strongly recommends that health care professionals carefully monitor patients on Raptiva, as well as those who have discontinued the drug, for any signs or symptoms of neurologic disease, and that they periodically reassess the benefits of continued treatment. Patients should be aware of the symptoms of PML and contact their health care professionals immediately if they experience any such symptoms.
Raptiva is a once-weekly injection approved for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic (whole body) therapy or phototherapy. The drug works by suppressing T-cells (blood cells that help fight infection) in the immune system.
These cells, when activated, migrate to the skin and cause inflammation which results in the red, inflamed and scaly patches of skin, which is associated with psoriasis. By suppressing T-cells, Raptiva decreases the function of the immune system which increases a patient’s susceptibility to infections.
Since the approval of Raptiva (efalizumab) in October 2003, the FDA has received reports of three confirmed cases and one possible case of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in patients who were 47 to 73 years of age who were using Raptiva for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Two of the patients with confirmed PML and one patient with possible PML died. All four patients were treated with Raptiva continuously for more than three years. None of the patients were receiving other treatments that suppress the immune system while taking Raptiva.
PML is a rare, serious, progressive neurologic disease caused by a virus that affects the central nervous system. When PML occurs, it is usually in people whose immune systems have been severely weakened and often results in an irreversible decline in neurologic function and death. There is no known effective treatment for PML.
Raptiva works by affecting T-cells in the immune system. The effects of Raptiva also decrease the function of the immune system and increase susceptibility to infections.
Raptiva was approved for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in 2003. There were no cases of PML seen in the clinical trials that supported the approval of Raptiva. At the time of approval, a total of 2,764 patients had been treated with Raptiva. Of those 2,764 patients, 2400 had been treated for three months, 904 for six months, and 218 for one year or more.
In October 2008, the labeling for Raptiva was changed to highlight, in a Boxed Warning, the risks of life-threatening infections, including PML. In addition, FDA directed Genentech, the manufacturer of Raptiva, to develop a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS, to ensure that patients receive risk information about Raptiva.
The FDA is reviewing this latest information. The agency will take appropriate steps to ensure that the risks of Raptiva do not outweigh its benefits, that patients prescribed Raptiva are clearly informed of the signs and symptoms of PML, and that health care professionals carefully monitor patients for the possible development of PML.
Healthcare providers should, in the interim, be aware of the following information and advice:
Raptiva increases the risk of PML. Longer, continuous use may further increase this risk.
Inform patients using Raptiva of the potential risk of developing PML.
There are no known screening tests that can reliably predict PML or medical interventions that can prevent or treat this disease.
Monitor patients being treated with Raptiva for the onset of neurologic symptoms. Discontinue Raptiva if PML is suspected.
Patients treated with Raptiva should be periodically re-evaluated to ensure that the benefit of treatment continues to outweigh the risks. Consideration should be given to use of other approved therapies to control the patients’ psoriasis.
The effects of periodic or intermittent use of Raptiva, or the concomitant use of other immunosuppressant drugs on the risk for PML is not known.
Patients using Raptiva should:
Be aware that Raptiva increases the risk of developing PML. PML is a disease that is fatal or causes severe disability.
Talk with their healthcare provider about the benefits and risks of treatment with Raptiva.
Be aware of the symptoms of PML which may include unusual weakness, loss of coordination, changes in vision, difficulty speaking and sometimes personality changes.
Contact their healthcare provider immediately if they experience these symptoms.
Understand that there are no laboratory screening tests for PML or medical interventions that can prevent or treat PML
In October 2008, the product labeling for Raptiva was revised to highlight in a boxed warning the risks of life-threatening infections, including PML. At that time, the FDA directed Genentech, the manufacturer, to develop a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) to include a medication guide to educate patients about the drug’s risks.
According to Reuters, Genentech Inc (DNA.N) is developing plans to minimize the risks of a deadly infection reported in patients who took the company’s Raptiva psoriasis drug, a company spokeswoman said on Thursday.
The European Medicines Agency recommended suspension of Raptiva’s marketing approval after three confirmed reports of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, or PML. U.S. regulators said they were reviewing the cases.
“We are evaluating all possible approaches to address the risk of PML with Raptiva use, including a risk minimization plan,” Genentech spokeswoman Tara Cooper said.
Genentech markets Raptiva in the United States. Merck Serono, a unit of Merck KGaA (MRCG.DE), holds marketing rights to Raptiva in Europe. (Reporting by Lisa Richwine, editing by Lisa Von Ahn)
Infections, including serious infections leading to hospitalizations or death, have been observed in patients treated with RAPTIVA . These infections have included bacterial sepsis, viral meningitis, invasive fungal disease and other opportunistic infections. Patients should be educated about the symptoms of infection and be closely monitored for signs and symptoms of infection during and after treatment with RAPTIVA. If a patient develops a serious infection, RAPTIVA should be discontinued and appropriate therapy instituted.
Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy PML) resulting from JC virus infection has occurred during therapy with RAPTIVA.
Health care professionals and consumers may report serious adverse events (side effects) or product quality problems with the use of this product to the FDA’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting program online, by regular mail, fax or phone.
The FDA asks health care providers and patients to report possible cases of PML to the FDA through the MedWatch program by phone (1-800-FDA-1088) or by the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/index.html
12/15/07 – Study Finds Much of Private-Sector Consumer Medication Information Not Consistently Useful
A study released today by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration found that the printed consumer medication information (CMI) voluntarily provided with new prescriptions by retail pharmacies does not consistently provide easy-to-read, understandable information about the use and risks of medications.
The study, Expert and Consumer Evaluation of Consumer Medication Information, showed that while most consumers (94 percent) received CMI with new prescriptions, only about 75 percent of this information met the minimum criteria for usefulness as defined by a panel of stakeholders. In 1996, Congress called for 95 percent of all new prescriptions to be accompanied by useful CMI by 2006.
“The current voluntary system has failed to provide consumers with the quality information they need in order to use medicines effectively and safely,” said Janet Woodcock, M.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “Because the congressional goals have not been met, the FDA intends to seek public comment on initiatives that can be used to meet the goals.”
CMI has been defined as being useful if it includes scientifically accurate, unbiased information that is presented in an understandable and legible format. Specifically, CMI should include the drug name and uses, how to monitor for improvement in the condition being treated, contraindications (situations when the medicine should not be used), symptoms of serious or frequent adverse reactions and what to do, and certain general information, including statements encouraging patients to talk to their health care professional.
“We need to work with pharmacy operators, drug manufacturers, health care professionals, and consumers to come up with a sensible, comprehensive and more effective solution,” said Woodcock.
In early 2009, the FDA Risk Communication Advisory Committee will hold a public meeting to discuss the study’s findings. In addition, the FDA has created a Web site to receive public comment on the study and solicit feedback on the best ways to provide useful prescription information to consumers.
If you or someone you love was injured by the severe side effects of Defective Drugs you may be entitled to pursue financial compensation for your pain and suffering, but if you wait too long laws called statutes of limitations could prevent you from pressing your case. Let a dedicated and experienced defective drug attorney help you get you the restitution you deserve.
Digitek – A condition known as digitalis toxicity, symptoms of this condition include nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and bradycardia, which is a dangerously low resting heart rate.
Heparin FDA Recall -The Heparin recall was initiated because the multiple-dose injections allegedly lead to serious and almost immediate side effects
Raptiva is a once-weekly injection approved for adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic (whole body) therapy or phototherapy. The drug works by suppressing T-cells (blood cells that help fight infection) in the immune system.
These cells, when activated, migrate to the skin and cause inflammation which results in the red, inflamed and scaly patches of skin, which is associated with psoriasis. By suppressing T-cells, Raptiva decreases the function of the immune system which increases a patient’s susceptibility to infections.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently issued Raptiva Side Effects Warning a public health advisory concerning three confirmed, and one possible report of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare brain infection, in patients using the psoriasis drug Raptiva (efalizumab).
Yasmin Birth control drug is the latest drug to come under scrutiny. Yasmin has been associated with several serious side effects including stroke, heart attack and even death. Women a history involving cardiovascular problems should be especially careful.
Other severe side effects include:
Severe allergic reactions including :rash, hives, itching, difficulty breathing.
Tightness in the chest swelling of the mouth, face, lips, or tongue.
Generic versus brand name drugs are always an issue for pharmaceutical companies.If there are drug companies producing generic versions of drugs illegally, then it should very well be an issue.
This is the case with Shire who has a track record of filing lawsuits against other drug companies.This time they are filing patent infringement lawsuits against Nostrum Pharmaceuticals and Apotex for attempting to apply to be able to market versions of its anti-seizure drug Carbatrol.
Carbatrol is used to treat patients who suffer seizures disorders and trigeminal neuralgia.Trigeminal neuralgia is described as episodes of “sudden, brief, recurrent, stabbing facial pain.”
There are rules and regulations that must be followed when producing generic drugs some of which are in place to protect consumers.If a company is not following these rules they can be detrimental to the public health.
This is the cause of some pharmaceutical drug recalls.Consumers use the recalled drug ignorant of its recall status and consequently suffer extreme adverse effects and sometimes death.
If you have taken a drug and have experienced any adverse side effects consult with one of our attorneys as well as visit our website at www.kerrysteigerwalt.com.(Always seek the medical attention you need first.)
Gardasil, a vaccine made for HPV Prevention for young women and teens is reported to have links to dangerous side effects.
Over 7,000 complaints have been made ranging from blood clots, nausea loss of movement and death.
Out of the 10 deaths none were confirmed by the CDC.
Two girls allege in court that the vaccine made them sick.
One — Jesalee Parsons of Broken Bow, Oklahoma — got the shot at age 13.
Jesalee’s lawyer, Michael McLaren, said she got the shot on February 27, 2007 and soon developed a fever and felt pain. The next day, he said, Jesalee felt pain in her chest and abdomen.
The maker of the drug, Merk, claims their product is safe.
Pfizer Inc.’s once promising anti-smoking drug Chantix received another blow Wednesday after a nonprofit group’s report about serious physical side effects prompted the Federal Aviation Administration to ban the drug’s use by pilots and air traffic controllers.The report, from the Institute for Safe Medication Practices, points out hundreds of serious problems reported since the popular drug was approved in May 2006, including dizziness, loss of consciousness, seizures, and abnormal spasms and movements.
“We have immediate safety concerns about the use of varenicline (Chantix) among persons operating aircraft, trains, buses and other vehicles, or in other settings where a lapse in alertness or motor control could lead to massive, serious injury,” the researchers said in the report.
FAA spokesman Les Dorr said the Chantix ban is effective immediately and that the agency was notifying unions representing pilots and controllers. He said the FAA is unaware of any aviation accident caused or contributed to by Chantix. Pfizer, in a statement, reaffirmed its stand on the drug’s safety and said the label already contains safety warnings about driving or operating machinery.
“We have immediate safety concerns about the use of varenicline (Chantix) among persons operating aircraft, trains, buses and other vehicles, or in other settings where a lapse in alertness or motor control could lead to massive, serious injury,” the researchers said in the report.